Digital Fairness Act:
Recommendations for the upcoming proposal
Published: July 9th, 2026
The European Commission is currently drafting its upcoming proposal for the Digital Fairness Act, a legislation aimed, among others, at strengthening consumer protection against misleading influencer marketing.
WHAT TO FIX led an open letter signed by 15 organizations and academics, recommending that Influencer Marketing Rules Encompass All Platform Monetization Services.
The letter called for the following transparency around platform payouts to content creators and publishers:
- Content labels indicating when a post, video, or stream benefits from platform monetization features
- Account labels indicating when an account participates in monetization programs or has monetization features enabled
- Monetization libraries or equivalent public repositories that allow stakeholders to understand who benefits from platforms’ monetization programs and features, and enable independent oversight
- Transparency around platforms’ monetization governance, including the applicable policies, moderation processes, and enforcement metrics relevant to the rollout of their monetization programs and features
WHAT TO FIX IN INFLUENCER MARKETING
Our proposed fixes expand on already available transparency features to account for platform-facilitated revenue generation:
1️⃣ CONTENT LABELS
Users should be able to easily identify if a content they engage with is subject to a financial reward or remuneration from platforms.
2️⃣ ACCOUNT LABELS
Users should be able to easily check which platform monetization services an account they engage with is registered for.
3️⃣ ACCOUNT TRANSPARENCY
Users should be able to access monetization information as part of an account’s transparency.
4️⃣ MONETIZATION LIBRARY
Users should be able to easily review the full monetization history of the accounts they interact with.
5️⃣ REPORTING MECHANISM
Users should be able to easily report monetizing accounts and content that violate platforms’ policies or the law.
6️⃣ ENFORCEMENT REPORT
Users should be able to review platforms’ enforcement of their monetization terms and policies and assess progress over time.
7️⃣ MONETIZATION PREVALENCE
Users should be able to understand how much of the violating activity on platforms comes from accounts the platform itself monetizes.
8️⃣ TRANSPARENCY CENTER
Users should be able to easily access information on platforms’ approach to monetization governance within existing transparency centers.
WHY MONETIZATION TRANSPARENCY FOR CONSUMER PROTECTION?
Influencers’ brand marketing represents only one form of online monetization.
Social media monetization services encompass the various programs, features and functionalities that platforms offer to content creators and publishers to enable them to earn revenue from their on-platform activity. These services range from revenue-sharing schemes and creator funds to subscriptions, gifts, bonuses, and other performance-based rewards.
At present, consumers in the European Union have no structured way of knowing whether the content they encounter is generating earnings or receiving payouts from platforms.
As with influencer marketing, the absence of such information can contribute to an erosion of trust in digital platforms and the online information environment.
Monetization enables –and shapes– content creation.
Understanding the business model behind the content that is created and uploaded to our feeds is key to restoring trust in our online information ecosystem.
Consumers deserve the full context on the content they consume.
Beyond influencer marketing, consumers should have information to understand how brands, audiences, and platforms themselves influence content production.
All items
DSA complaint: Meta’s monetization enforcement and reporting
Auditing Monetization Terms: Platform are Failing Creators Under the DSA
WHAT TO FIX’s Recommendations for the Digital Fairness Act proposal
Open Letter: Influencer Marketing Rules Must Encompass All Platform Monetisation Services
WHAT TO FIX’s Submission to the Copyright Directive Consultation
WHAT TO FIX’s Submission to Article 50 AI Act Consultation
WHAT TO FIX’s Submission to the European Democracy Shield Consultation
WHAT TO FIX’s Submission to Ofcom (OSA Transparency Notices)
De-Risking Social Media Monetization: Rating Platforms’ Coverage of Monetisation-Related Risks
Democracy Shield: WHAT TO FIX’s Position Paper
WHAT TO FIX Urges Transparency into Social Media Monetization in Exchange of Views with European Parliament
EU Democracy Shield: WHAT TO FIX’s recommendations to the European Parliament
Issue Brief: New Incentives, Evolving Threats
Monetization Principles: Paving the Way towards Responsible Monetization Governance
WHAT TO FIX’s Submission To The DSA’s Article 40 Delegated Act