Monetizing Sanctioned Pages:
Why Platform Profit Models Demand Deeper Scrutiny
Meta’s monetization programs have allowed entities under international sanctions to remain eligible for revenue-sharing partnerships, raising concerns about compliance and oversight. In several documented cases, Facebook pages affiliated with sanctioned state actors, military entities, and individuals accused of serious human rights violations have continued to generate or promote monetized content despite restrictions imposed by the EU, the United States, and other jurisdictions.
This session drew from the WHAT TO FIX monetization archive and unpacked how platform design, enforcement gaps, and opaque governance mechanisms have enabled sanctioned entities in the EU, Bangladesh, and beyond to benefit from Meta’s monetization tools.
Publications
All items
EUDisinfoLab Webinar: Monetizing Sanctioned Entities
Jul 8, 2025
Raising Concerns Over Social Media Companies’ Failure to Disclose Risks Related to Their Monetization Services Under the DSA
Aug 4, 2025
RightsCon Taipei: Monetization Principles Consultation
Mar 12, 2025
WHAT TO FIX at RightsCon25
Feb 17, 2025
Far-Right Influencers And The Platforms That Enable Them
Nov 14, 2024
#EUDisinfo2024: Can Advertising Cash Stop Funding Misinformation Trash?
Oct 14, 2024
#EUDisinfo2024: Mission NOT Accomplished: Unintended Fallbacks From Investigations
Oct 11, 2024
DRAPAC 2024: How Is Social Media Monetization Fueling Disinformation In Asia? And What Should We Do About It?
Aug 20, 2024
POINT 2024: How To Pull The Plug On Monetizing Disinformation
Jun 29, 2024
Global Fact 2024: How Social Media Ad Revenue Sharing Is Subsidizing Disinformation Globally
Jun 29, 2024
EUDisinfoLab Webinar: From Content To Payment
Jun 14, 2024
Monetizing Sanctioned Pages: Why Platform Profit Models Demand Deeper Scrutiny
Sep 13, 2025